You’ve invested in leadership development. Engaged with expert facilitators, and collected post-session feedback. However, six months later, team dynamics haven’t changed, managers still struggle to communicate effectively, and the potential leader who was going to be promoted just handed in their resignation.
And then you ask yourself: what was the ROI of leadership development?
It’s a natural question when the investment does not translate to visible leadership behaviour change. But the truth is, the answer almost always lies in the programme’s design.
Are you tracking the right metrics?
Completion rates. Satisfaction scores. Session attendance. These are the most commonly reported ROI of leadership training metrics and yet they’re often not enough to give you the full picture.
Australian HR Institute’s (AHRI) research identified leadership development as one of the most effective strategies to reduce Australia’s 16% annual employee turnover rate. But you arrive at that conclusion only when leadership development outcomes are visible. What programmes need to track is how managers actually lead their teams, hold performance conversations, and retain people in their teams.
Gartner found that 76% of organisations have increased spending on leadership development. However, 71% of HR leaders still report they are not effectively developing their leaders.
When L&D budgets are growing but programmes are failing to facilitate lasting change, something isn’t right.
What separates programmes that change behaviour from those that don’t
In a 12-month leadership development programme TransforMe delivered to 21 high-potential women leaders across legal, finance, HR, procurement, and operations at a large industrial organisation:
86% credited the programme as a key driver of their leadership growth over the year
78% reported feeling significantly prepared to take on senior or strategic roles
100% reported stronger resilience
What made the programme design exceptional was the fact that learning was never separated from application. Virtual sessions, group coaching, simulations, and pre- and post-work were built as a single sustained system across 12 months. Behaviour change was the goal from day one.
This is the ROI of leadership development that CHROs can actually defend in a board conversation: leaders who lead differently in the situations that matter, in ways their organisations can observe.
Need for programmes that understand your organisation’s context
A leadership development programme in Australia that understands the organisation’s context, the culture and the unwritten rules will always deliver great results.
According to the numbers reported by ABS, up to 500 managers retire every single day. And only 4% of the broader workforce currently aspires to reach management roles. The pipeline is narrowing at the very intersection organisations need it to widen. Hybrid work has complicated how leaders build trust and accountability across distributed teams. And Gartner’s research shows that 75% of HR leaders report their managers are overwhelmed — with as much as 51% of a middle manager’s time now consumed by individual contributor work rather than leadership.
This is the everyday environment in which your leaders are operating and trying to grow. An impactful programme, that is crafted with these realities in mind produces leadership development outcomes that live long after the workshop or the training ends.
What TransforMe builds
Most leadership programmes are designed to inform. TransforMe’s are designed to change behaviour — which requires a fundamentally different architecture.
The diagnostic comes first. Understanding how a leadership team or cohort actually functions — where trust breaks down, where communication distorts, where accountability diffuses — shapes everything that follows. Without that, even well-facilitated sessions address the wrong problems.
From there, a tailored leadership development programme is built around real situations:
The performance conversation a manager is avoiding
The team alignment that collapsed after an acquisition or a leadership restructure
The senior leader whose communication style doesn’t influence or inspire her team
Coaching, peer learning, and structured application are some mechanisms through which insight becomes habit.
When Cleartrip brought TransforMe in to work with their newly assembled CXO team post-acquisition — a group of experienced, senior leaders — the outcome was not just improved team dynamics. As CFO Aditya Agarwal reflected: “As a company we’ve really grown almost 3x since that first SS Lab. I think it wouldn’t have happened if we had not established that level of working relationship.”
That is what the ROI of leadership training looks like when the programme is designed to reach it.
The right leadership training partner changes what’s measurable
Leadership ROI comes from running the right programme, designed for your leaders, measured against tangible organisational outcomes.
One-off training events do not build capability. They build familiarity with concepts. A structured leadership development programme — sustained over time, grounded in diagnostic insight, and built around real behaviour change — is what produces results that survive long after the programme.
The cost of a programme that does not work is not just the fee. It is another year of the same gaps.
Speak to TransforMe about designing a programme that delivers ROI your board can see.
Before you read any further, take a moment to imagine a CEO. Now imagine a CFO or just any other C-suite level leader. Was any of them a woman?
If your answer is no, there’s data that tells you why that’s the case.
HiBob’s 2026 Women in the Workplace study found that only 14% of women received a promotion last year. That’s down from 25%, while the number of men that were promoted nearly doubled.
The conversation around empowering women leaders often circles back to representation. We’ve collectively accepted that representation matters but have stopped short of asking the harder question: does our current approach actually build women into leaders, or does it just give them a seat at the table?
Representation is rising but is it enough?
Hiring more women is not the same as building women leaders.
Most organisations have made real progress at the entry level. Campus cohorts are more balanced than ever and diversity dashboards reflect intent. But somewhere between joining and getting to the corner office, women often begin to disappear into a system dominated by men. The drop-off accelerates long before the conversation for a C-suite role begins.
McKinsey and LeanIn.org call this the ‘broken rung’. For every 100 men promoted from entry-level to manager, only 87 women are on the same trajectory. That first rung compounds across an entire career and explains far more of the senior-leadership gap than the glass ceiling itself.
Then there’s the sponsorship problem. As Herminia Ibarra wrote in her now-classic Harvard Business Review study, Why Men Still Get More Promotions Than Women: Women are over-mentored and under-sponsored.
Women receive plenty of advice on how to navigate the system. They receive far less active advocacy in rooms where roles are assigned and successors are named. Mentors talk to you. Sponsors talk about you.
Add subtler frictions like bias in performance reviews, the ‘she’s not quite ready’ feedback, and the assumption that motherhood signals a career slowdown are some invisible challenges.
An impactful women’s leadership training programme that takes into account these realities can be useful in empowering women leaders.
Look at women’s leadership as a business multiplier
McKinsey’s Diversity Wins report tracked more than 1,000 companies across 15 countries and found that those in the top quartile for gender diversity on executive teams were 25% more likely to outperform on profitability.
This is why empowering women leaders strengthens gender equity and enterprise performance simultaneously. It naturally leads to better decisions, stronger stakeholder alignment, higher innovation scores, and a culture that retains talent in a market where retention is harder than hiring.
Viewed this way, empowering women leaders through leadership training can hit three birds with a stone. Your organisation invests in capability development, succession planning, and organisational resilience building at once.
4 ways women’s leadership training drives measurable business impact
Stronger leadership bench
Structured women’s leadership training creates future-ready leaders. Most senior women in corporates have risen despite functioning in a system that was never designed for them in the first place. A well-designed programme navigates the broken system so reaching and thriving on top doesn’t depend on luck or grit alone.
Improved decision-making
Diverse leadership sharpens strategic judgement. BCG’s research on innovation found that companies with above-average diversity at the management level generated 45% of their revenue from new products and services — versus 26% for less-diverse peers.
Cultural transformation from the top
Empowering women leaders improves psychological safety and engagement across teams. A widely cited Harvard Business Review analysis by Zenger and Folkman found that women were rated higher than men on 17 of 19 leadership competencies including resilience, developing others, and driving for results.
Market and customer alignment
Women leaders better represent the consumer base your business is actually selling to and the workforce you’re actually trying to retain. In sectors like BFSI, retail, healthcare and digital, where a considerable number of women are executors and decision-makers, your leadership composition is a commercial signal.
Ignoring women’s leadership training is risky
If the women you’ve recruited can’t see a credible path to the top, they will also leave like any other employee. If your succession bench is shallow on one side, your business continuity sits on one leg. If your leadership cohort doesn’t look like your market, your strategic instincts could have a negative impact on consumer behaviour.
And if your competitors are building real leadership equity while you are running symbolic campaigns, the gap widens sooner than you realise.
From intention to institutional strategy
Real change doesn’t come from a single programme. It comes from how leadership decisions are made, measured, and held to account.
A useful starting point is to audit your own pipeline honestly.
Where do women drop out — at which level, in which functions, and why?
Who is being sponsored into stretch roles, and who is being mentored without ever being recommended?
How are leadership behaviours defined and assessed?
Are promotion decisions consistent with the values you publish externally?
Once you have the answers, invest in structured development that is tied to business outcomes. Align leadership KPIs to diversity outcomes like pipeline health, sponsorship activity, promotion equity. Engage senior leaders as named, accountable sponsors, not occasional patrons.
The strategic move
Women’s leadership is an underutilised strategic lever.
If your organisation is ready to move beyond symbolic diversity and build measurable leadership capability, it’s time to rethink how you approach women’s leadership.
At TransforMe, we’ve partnered with leading organisations to design women’s leadership development programmes that produce clear, measurable outcomes. Our flagship women’s leadership programme, Evolve, is built for organisations focused on gender diversity and strengthening their leadership pipeline.
In a recent cohort, 78% of participants said they were able to tackle gender bias at work after the programme, and 43% reported a meaningful lift in their visibility and ability to influence within their organisations.
Want to invest in women’s leadership training programmes but have questions? Fill out this form and someone from our team will get in touch soon.
In 2006, Hans Rosling stood on the TED stage and presented data about child mortality rates, income distribution and how life expectancy varies across 200 countries. The data offered nothing that most development economists weren’t already aware of. Rosling showcased data in a way that no one had ever seen and experienced before. He animated the numbers, invoked different characters, built tension, and told several stories with a beginning, a middle, and a genuinely surprising end.
He caught everyone’s attention and breathed life into a subject that may not have interested everyone otherwise.
Today, organisations around the world, including Australia, have access to more data, more dashboards, and more strategy documents than ever before. When you learn to turn information into a story that people can feel and remember, they can inspire, influence and drive action.
This is where storytelling training for leaders comes in.
Why leadership messages don’t land
There are three reasons a message fails to move people.
The first is overload. Most employees are operating in high-information environments. So, when leaders communicate through data, slides, and bullet points, the message becomes just another item competing for attention.
A Carnegie Mellon study found that facts activate only the language centres of the brain, while stories activate up to seven regions — including those responsible for emotion, memory, and sensory experience. People don’t just hear a story, they experience it.
The second is unclear stakes. Teams are often told what is changing, but not what happens if nothing changes. Without understanding the risk, urgency, or opportunity, people default to working the way they always have.
The third is no clear ask. Many meetings end without a decision or a next step because the message was informative but not directional. People leave the room informed, but unsure of what they are supposed to do differently.
Communication must offer clarity on the situation and the action that must follow.
What changes when leaders learn to use story
We have moved from the age of information to the age of influence. Leaders are no longer expected to just inform. They are expected to inspire, engage, and influence decisions, alignment and action.
At TransforMe, we believe that a leader who influences knows how to do two things—tell the right story, and tell the story right.
That’s what you learn at the end of a good leadership storytelling training. The impact of telling the right story and telling the story right is visible sooner than you realise. Alignment happens faster. Decisions become easier to make. Buy-in becomes genuine rather than performative. Execution improves because teams are working towards an outcome they actually understand.
Great storytelling requires more preparation than you think
One of the most persistent myths about storytelling is that it is spontaneous—that great communicators are just naturally compelling. In reality, what looks effortless in the room is almost always the result of deliberate structure applied before it.
In TransforMe’s leadership storytelling training, you work with a repeatable framework built for business situations which looks like this:
Hook → Context → Stakes → Path → Ask
You learn how to get people’s attention with a hook and then set the context for them. Once the context is clear, you tell them what’s at stake and what are the different ways in which the risk can be minimised. This clarity makes the message actionable.
When Ryan Morrell from Daisee completed The Art of Storytelling programme, he described it as learning “how powerful a story can be in inspiring others — whether they be your customers or your team.” His cohort built three compelling narratives and implemented them across the organisation over four months.
Jessica Duarte from Google noted the facilitator’s ability to “extract the science of storytelling and empower teams to not only tell better stories themselves, but help others do the same.” Audience engagement scores at the flagship event rose by 30%.
These outcomes are the result of a repeatable framework, applied consistently.
What you learn: structure, sequencing, and presence
Storytelling training for leaders is about clarity, sequencing and confident delivery in situations where the outcome of the conversation matters.
You learn to carefully craft a message so the logic and the stakes are clear. You also learn to sequence information in a way that explains the rationale behind a decision. And finally, you learn how to deliver the message in a compelling way. Most leaders get to practise the ask and so, they leave The Art of Storytelling programme knowing how to move forward in a certain situation.
The methodology is deliberately hands-on: practice loops, video recording, personalised feedback from expert facilitators, and NLP-informed approaches to help leaders embed new habits under pressure even after the workshop ends.
Where to apply it immediately
The real test of any leadership storytelling training is what leaders take back to their teams, their customers, and their high-stakes conversations.
During one of the cohorts, a sales consultant who was technically brilliant and had thorough knowledge of the product was someone who was always unsure of himself. In a role-playing session, where he could literally practice the ask, he stopped performing and started connecting— let his guard down and brought his whole self into the conversation.
“I think he’s going to take that (experience) back with his customers and I think he will do extremely well”, observed a key stakeholder of the business. That is what storytelling training for leaders unlocks.
Shift mindsets, then shift actions
People act when they see the context, feel the stakes, and know what is expected of them. When organisations want to humanise data and translate the impact of the numbers storytelling training for leaders becomes an important catalyst. How does a low EBITDA margin affect your team? What happens if Q1 targets are met? What’s the rationale behind those targets?
When you’re able to answer questions like these in a comprehensive way, you’ve mastered the art of storytelling.
TransforMe’s Art of Storytelling programme has helped leaders at Google, ANZ Bank, McKinsey, EY, Accenture, KPMG, and Flight Centre build this capability. It is hands-on, evidence-based, and built around the real conversations Australian leaders should have.
If your organisation needs faster alignment and stronger buy-in, this is where it starts. Get in touch to explore how The Art of Storytelling can build the communication capability your leadership team needs.
Why transparency in leadership is important for gaining employees’ trust
Nearly 45% of Australians say they lack trusted relationships at work, according to the TELUS Mental Health Index.
Almost four in ten employees say they are unsure whether workplace issues like conflict or harassment are addressed fairly.
These numbers tell an unfortunate tale of workplaces where trust is far more fragile than what leaders typically assume.
You’d think they point to dramatic leadership failure but it’s often everyday moments that gradually erode employees’ trust. A situation where action is expected but information is incomplete. A restructure is announced without any clear details. A change in strategy shared without context.
People expect transparency in leadership but when they do not have clarity on why decisions are being made or what they mean for them, they tend to lose trust in leadership.
The most effective way to minimise this trust deficiency is to offer transparency in leadership.
We’ll talk more about how to improve transparency but let’s first find out if your organisation has a trust deficit.
What trust deficit looks like inside organisations
The trust deficit builds gradually when leadership or internal communication leaves gaps that employees may fill themselves. It often makes room for rumours and speculation to quickly fill the vacuum which leads to subtle disengagement.
The warning signs often appear in behaviour before they appear in metrics:
Rumour cycles replace official communication, especially after vague announcements
Managers begin translating leadership messages because the original explanation lacked clarity
Passive resistance or artificial harmony grows, where employees comply but question decisions privately
Discretionary effort declines, as employees stop investing energy beyond what is required
Nokia’s then CEO Stephen Elop’s popular memo about the ‘burning platform’ is one of the greatest examples of tackling trust deficit by ensuring transparency in leadership.
Back in 2011, he was assigned the challenging task of communicating to the employees that the company was in troubled waters and their jobs might be at risk. “We too are standing on a burning platform and we must decide how we’re going to change our behaviour”, Stephen wrote in the memo.
He understood that employees can handle difficult news but what could potentially break their trust is vague, confusing communication.
Why more Australian employees expect transparency in leadership
“There are challenges like inflation, housing affordability, and job loss risks that are clear stressors, especially at the start of a person’s career when there is typically less financial stability,” Paula Allen, Global Leader, Research & Client Insights, TELUS Health, said in a statement. It should be no surprise then that TELUS Mental Health Index also found that employees under the age of 40 are more likely to report lack of trust in workplaces. According to Mercer’s Global Talent Trends report, employee trust in organisations dropped from 82% to 72% between 2022 and 2024. This decline can be attributed to three major factors:
Change fatigue Organisational restructures, economic volatility and technological disruption mean employees are adjusting to new priorities more frequently than before.
Hybrid work Hybrid environments have reduced informal conversations that were possible in common workspaces. This makes formal leadership communication even more important to understand the big picture
Uncertainty about the future Market changes, AI adoption, and evolving business models mean organisations themselves are still figuring out their direction. Employees recognise this and expect honesty about what leaders know, what they do not know, and how decisions will be made moving forward
Transparency in leadership is not oversharing Many leaders hesitate to practise transparency in leadership because they assume it means sharing everything. But the truth is employees do not expect every internal detail. They simply want to understand how decisions are being made and what would be the implications of those decisions on them. Without this context, organisations often fall into the opposite extreme: information dumps. Leaders share large volumes of data without explaining what it means, or the core message changes as it is passed on through the hierarchy.
The Transparency Playbook — 5 practices leaders can implement
Building workplace transparency requires consistent behaviour shifts. Here are five simple but effective leadership practices that will help minimise trust deficit.
Explain decision logic Walk employees through the context behind a decision: the options considered, the trade-offs involved, and the final choice
Create a predictable communication cadence Regular updates reduce speculation. When employees know when information will be shared, rumour cycles shrink
Close the loop on feedback Explain what leaders heard, what changed as a result, and what did not
Equip managers with clear talking points Managers often become translators of leadership communication. Providing FAQs and consistent messaging ensures teams hear the same explanation
Be clear about uncertainty Sharing what is known, what is still being assessed, and when the next decision will be made helps reduce anxiety.
How to rebuild transparency in leadership like a repeatable system
The O.C. Tanner Global Culture Report 2026, based on nearly 38,000 employees and leaders across 23+ countries, found that only about half of employees believe their organisations are truly transparent.
So, no matter how powerful your town hall and meeting room speeches are, trust doesn’t grow through words but through patterns employees observe over time. Consistency, fairness, follow-through and clear communication under pressure restore credibility.
But how can leaders ensure that they remain calm and maintain credibility when the risks are real and the stakes are high? We’ve trained leaders across the globe to navigate these complexities and improve transparency in leadership through our Breakthrough Leadership Programme.
Transparency is a leadership capability, not PR
The conversation about trust often begins with communication, but it ultimately ends with leadership behaviour. Transparency in leadership is not about sharing more information but about helping people understand decisions, trade-offs and direction.
At TransforMe, we work with organisations to help leaders practise effective communication and behaviour shifts through experiential learning, coaching, and real workplace scenarios.
If strengthening transparency and rebuilding employee trust is a priority for your organisation but you don’t know where to start, schedule a discovery call today. Let’s together evaluate how strong your current leadership communication is or are there any gaps that require immediate attention.
Effective storytelling can set your business apart.
Jeff Bezos once said, “You can have the best technology, you can have the best business model, but if the storytelling isn’t amazing, it won’t matter.” Amazon’s CEO knew the power of strategically sequencing facts and emotions.
Your business could be based in Australia or you could be leading a diverse team that operates from different parts of the world. Irrespective of geography, storytelling trainingis important because it can quickly become your differentiator. We live in a world where information and numbers are easily accessible so imagine how effectively, clearly and credibly your leaders could navigate high-stake conversations, if they just knew how.
At TransforMe, we believe in the power of storytelling: it all comes down to telling the right story vs telling the story right. As you read further, you’ll discover why every business needs storytelling training today.
What is storytelling training and why does it matter?
Storytelling training exists because humans don’t make sense of the world through bullet points and slides. Carnegie Mellon conducted a study that found facts activate only the language centres of the brain, while stories activate up to seven regions, including those responsible for emotion, memory, and sensory experience
In other words, people don’t just hear a story, they experience it.
Storytelling training for businessmatters because it teaches leaders how to work with this reality. It helps them choose the right story for the context, structure it deliberately, and anchor it in real experience rather than abstraction.
A quick search about the ‘Burning Platform’ by Stephen Elop, reveals the memo Nokia’s then CEO Stephen Elop sent its global employees in 2011. He had to tell them that the organisation was in troubled waters and people were going to lose their jobs.
Stephen sent out a memo telling them that they were on a burning platform where they could either choose to jump to save themselves or slowly burn with it. It’s one of the most memorable examples of business storytelling that still lives on the internet.
How storytelling can help your business
When storytelling coach Gatik Chaujer was working with Vanessa, she was preparing to speak at a conference for technical managers. Her subject was the tension between customer privacy and personalisation which made her content rigorous, data-rich and heavy. So she opened with an incident we often share in our storytelling training sessions.
When her daughter was six, she loved to personalise everything: backpacks, stationery, books with stickers of her name on them. By the age of 13, she wanted absolute privacy. “I decide what I want to share,” her daughter announced.
Vanessa went on to add, “Customers grow too. Their expectations evolve. If we keep treating them like they’re still six because we like the convenience of personalisation we’ll lose more than trust.”
Her story caught everyone’s attention because it was familiar and that’s something most businesses miss. Kevin Cashman, author of the book Leadership on the Inside says, “Numbers are numbing to most people while stories speak to the whole person, both head and heart.”
If you want to enable your leaders to tell a story like Vanesssa, invest in an effective storytelling training programme that will help:
Sharpen how your brand is understood Stories help people remember what you stand for.
Simplify complex decisions and processes By helping people interpret data and organise information in a way they can understand it best.
Increase persuasion without increasing pressure When people recognise themselves in the narrative, they’re less likely to resist leading to quicker decision-making.
Replace compliance with internal alignment Teams align to company values better when they understand why a choice was made and what it protects
People respond to stories not numbers
Today, you can find data, analysis and frameworks by simply tapping a few buttons on your phone or laptop. But how often do you stop scrolling just to pause and process all that information?
Think about the pandemic when deaths were reduced to mere numbers. What’s etched better in your memory, fluctuating numbers on screens or a friend recounting their recovery journey? Stories cut through saturation because they give people context. They help audiences understand why something matters now, not just what is happening.
Every business is made of people who connect to moments that reflect real choices and consequences. In competitive environments, that clarity becomes a differentiator especially when we’re dealing with shorter attention spans.
Storytelling training helps you humanise information by making it familiar and relatable.
3 secrets of powerful storytelling
Anyone who tells you that storytelling is about waiting for inspiration is probably lying. The truth is it’s all about preparation. What often looks spontaneous is usually the result of deliberate thinking done in advance.
In our storytelling training, we often share these tips with the participants:
Tactfully insert “key words” or “emotions” you want to invoke Strong stories don’t leave interpretation to chance. Tell your audience exactly how you felt, “I was thrilled the project finally came to an end” or “My energy was at an all-time high.” will help you establish strong emotional appeal
Build up to your JDM (Jaw Dropping Moment) When you’re telling a story, you know what’s that one moment that will instantly grab everyone’s attention. Scripting your story will help you sequence the build-up
Make it visual If they can imagine it, they can experience it. Something as simple as “I was about to board a flight when my phone rang…” can help them visualise the details
Getting started: Storytelling Training for Your Business
If you’re looking to invest in storytelling training for your business, choose one where the emphasis is on engaging, influencing, and capturing attention in everyday work scenarios using hands-on practice.
Remember that storytelling cannot be treated as a one-size-fits-all skill. A finance leader, a founder, and a people leader don’t tell stories the same way and need a tailored storytelling strategy to adapt narrative structures to their goals and audience.
The Art of Storytelling, TransForMe’s flagship storytelling training programme combines experiential workshops, proven narrative frameworks, and personalised feedback to help leaders apply storytelling where it matters most. We’ve helped 200+ clients across Australia and around the world master the art of storytelling.
Trust in managers has dropped from 46% in 2022 to just 29% in 2024, as per the survey conducted by DDI Global Leadership Forecast 2025. This isn’t just a statistic but a wake-up call. High-performing teams are raising the bar on what they expect from their leaders, and organisations that fail to respond risk losing their best people.
The Australian leadership development market is projected to grow from USD 1.46 billion in 2025 to USD 3.22 billion by 2035, driven by one undeniable reality: teams won’t settle for outdated leadership models. They’re demanding leaders who can navigate hybrid work, leverage AI responsibly, communicate with emotional intelligence, and create psychologically safe environments where people can do their best work.
The shift in what teams actually need
Gone are the days when leadership development focused primarily on technical competencies. Research shows that 77% of organisations lack sufficient leadership depth across levels, which means many companies are promoting technically strong individual contributors into leadership roles without equipping them for the human side of leadership. The result? Managers who excel at individual tasks but struggle to inspire teams, address conflict, or create alignment.
Today, if you want to build a high-performing team in Australia, invest in developing people skills in your leadership.Your teams want leaders who demonstrate empathy whilst maintaining accountability. They expect transparency in decision-making, not top-down directives. They need leaders who can hold difficult conversations without avoiding conflict, and who build trust through consistent behaviour rather than grand gestures.
What high-performing teams expect from leadership training in Australia
1. Hybrid leadership capabilities
Hybrid work isn’t going anywhere. Yet many leadership programmes still treat it as an afterthought, if they address it at all.
Teams working across home and office don’t need leaders who micromanage Zoom calendars. They need leaders who build trust without constant visibility, give feedback that lands over video calls, and keep teams aligned when face-to-face time is scarce. These aren’t soft skills. They’re essential capabilities that determine whether hybrid teams perform or fall apart.
2. Emotional intelligence, not just strategic thinking
90% of top performers have high emotional intelligence. Teams led by leaders with such quality experience significantly lower turnover and higher engagement.
Yet many leadership development programmes in Australia still treat emotional intelligence as a soft skill rather than a core competency. High-performing teams know better. They want leaders who understand how emotions drive behaviour, who can read the room, and who respond to stress with composure rather than reactivity.
Emotional intelligence is teachable but it requires experiential learning, not PowerPoint slides. The best leadership training Australia offers incorporates real-world scenarios, reflective practice, and individual coaching to help leaders develop self-awareness and empathy in measurable ways.
3. AI literacy without losing the human touch
AI is reshaping how work gets done, and teams expect leaders who can navigate this shift confidently. But AI literacy doesn’t mean becoming a technical expert. It means understanding how AI can enhance decision-making, streamline processes, and free teams to focus on higher-value work while recognising the ethical implications and limitations.
McKinsey found that companies in the top quintile for digital and AI maturity deliver 2–6 times higher shareholder returns than their peers. Leaders who can leverage technology without losing sight of the human element will drive performance. Those who resist or over-rely on automation will struggle.
4. Psychologically safe environments
Picture this: A project manager realises three weeks before launch that the timeline her team committed to is impossible. She knows this because her developers have been working late every night, stress is climbing, and quality is slipping. But in the weekly status meeting, when the director asks “Are we on track?”, she says “Yes, all good.”
Now picture a different scenario: Same situation, but this time she says “We’re behind. I misjudged the complexity, and I need your help reprioritising features to deliver what matters most.” The director doesn’t punish her honesty—he thanks her for flagging it early and works with her to adjust scope.
That’s psychological safety. And it’s not built by being nice. It’s built when leaders respond to bad news without blame, when they admit their own mistakes openly, and when they address underperformance without humiliation.
Creating this culture requires more than intention. It demands practice, feedback, and often an external voice to call out the blind spots leaders can’t see themselves.
5. Continuous learning, not one-off workshops
Let’s be honest: one-day workshops rarely stick. High-performing teams expect leadership development that’s woven into daily practice and not treated as a checkbox exercise.
Effective programmes combine workshops with individual coaching, peer accountability, and structured follow-up. They align leadership behaviours with business priorities and measure outcomes beyond participant satisfaction. They recognise that behaviour change takes time and reinforcement, not motivation alone.
The cost of getting leadership development wrong
Delaying or underinvesting in leadership development can reduce profits by as much as 7%. But the real cost shows up in ways that are harder to quantify: disengaged teams, preventable turnover, missed innovation, and leaders who burn out trying to do it all themselves.
Australian organisations can’t afford to treat leadership development as a nice-to-have. Not when 52% of organisations report that scalability and sustainment of leadership programmes are their top challenge. Not when the best talent increasingly chooses employers based on leadership quality and development opportunities.
Building leadership that high-performing teams deserve
The organisations that win in 2025 and beyond won’t have the flashiest programmes, they’ll have leadership development that’s tailored, experiential, and delivers measurable results.
At TransforMe, we’ve partnered with leading Australian organisations to build leaders who navigate complexity, communicate with clarity, and inspire high performance. Whether you’re developing first-time managers or senior executives, the principle is the same: leadership is a behaviour, not a title. And behaviours are shaped through practice, feedback, and accountability, not workshops alone.
High-performing teams are raising the bar. Are your leadership programmes keeping pace?
If you’re ready to explore leadership development that drives real results,TransforMe’s programmes are designed for organisations committed to building leaders who inspire, influence, and perform.
Did you know that advancing women’s leadership in Australia could add $128 billion to the country’s GDP? In fact, according to the CEW Senior Executive Census 2025, organisations with diverse leadership are 21% more likely to outperform their competition. There’s enough research that tells us that diversity in our leadership teams improves decision-making, leads to better risk management and overall organisational performance.
Yet despite years of intent, progress at senior levels remains slow and uneven. The reason behind that is a clear gap in the way leadership is identified, developed, and sustained inside organisations.
It’s time to pause and ask whether those systems genuinely work for women.
Addressing structural barriers for women
It would be ideal if leadership progression was purely merit-based and that the best could make it to the top naturally. But the truth is, leadership pathways are not linear and aren’t shaped by capability alone.
What may seem like a sprint for men is often a hurdle-laden marathon for women where they encounter barriers that are subtle but cumulative, and systemic. And these barriers often surface in the form of pay gaps. “When women are paid less than men, it affects their ability to save, invest, and plan for the future. And even more importantly it impedes their ability to pay down their debt due to not having the ability to develop that much needed savings pool”, writes Tammy Barton, founder of MyBudget.
Whether it’s the unconscious bias in hiring or promotion decisions or the fact that women are expected to be the primary caregivers are all factors that widen the gender gap.
Women’s leadership in Australia demands constructive change at an individual, organisational and societal level.
Sponsorship, not mentoring, is the real inflection point
A 2025 McKinsey report found that women are less likely to find a sponsor compared to men at senior levels. Even if they do find one at an entry-level, they’re promoted at a lower rate than men.
Sponsorship creates opportunity. Women are often well-mentored but under-sponsored. They receive advice on how to navigate the system, but fewer leaders actively advocate for them when roles are discussed, projects assigned, or succession decisions made.
Recently, the Chief Executive Women has been advocating a 40:40:20 target to achieve gender balance in organisations. Active sponsorship will play a key role if Australian companies commit to achieving this target.
The role of senior leadership
As leaders looking to actively invest in women’s leadership programmes, you want to ensure that your investment drives outcomes. To be able to do that, you must ask harder questions.
Where do women drop out of the leadership pipeline, and why? Who is being sponsored into stretch roles? How are leadership behaviours defined and assessed? Are promotion decisions consistent with stated values?
The most successful leaders do more than just offer encouragement. They incorporate accountability into systems. They make a connection between succession planning and leadership development. They monitor results over time. They hold themselves and their groups accountable for advancement.
This is where women leadership development programmes deliver the greatest value not as standalone initiatives, but as part of a broader leadership strategy.
Creating environments where women leaders can thrive
The McKinsey report also found that often women hesitate to rise and break glass ceilings because they lack support. Only 69% of entry-level women want a promotion versus 80% of entry-level men while 84% of senior-level women want to be promoted versus 92% of senior-level men.
What we’re seeing in organisations that are genuinely moving the needle is not a dramatic overhaul of talent strategy, but a simple change in everyday leadership behaviour.
Progress often starts with senior leaders showing up in small but meaningful ways. Checking in, not just on performance but on how someone is holding up. Being explicit about what progression actually takes. Saying a person’s name in rooms they’re not in yet. None of this requires a formal sponsorship label and yet it changes how advancement feels.
Constructive change through leadership development
As a leader and a decision-maker, you can choose to make a difference in a way that benefits women leaders and boosts organisational performance. And while many organisations are already investing in women’s leadership programmes, it’s important you choose one that promises maximum, measurable ROI.
Generic leadership programmes typically assume a level playing field. They focus on universal competencies without accounting for the additional layers women navigate like bias, stereotype threat, interrupted career paths, or lack of advocacy.
Effective programmes recognise that leadership is shaped by context, power dynamics and by organisational norms that determine whose voice carries weight. You must aim to look beyond skill-building, mentoring and invest in programmes that enable you to build psychologically safe work environments.
Confidence grows when women are given structured opportunities to practise influence, test judgement, and receive honest feedback in safe space. Behaviour change lasts when learning is reinforced over time, not delivered as a one-off intervention. And the most meaningful shifts occur when individual development is paired with organisational accountability.
From symbolic support to structural change
The real work lies in breaking barriers that are often invisible to those who have not experienced them. You have the opportunity to drive change by building leadership environments where women are not asked to adapt endlessly, but are supported to lead fully.
At TransforMe, we’ve partnered with several leading organisations who wanted to invest in a women’s leadership development programme that brings clear outcomes. In one organisation, our flagship programme Evolve enabled 78% participants to tackle gender bias at work. At the most recent cohort, 43% said their visibility and ability to influence improved after the programme.
TransforMe’s Evolve is a women’s leadership programme designed for organisations focused on gender diversity and strengthening their leadership pipeline with more women leaders. It supports companies looking to develop high-potential women professionals into confident managers, leaders, and strategic influencers. It is also suited to DEI teams seeking to build inclusive leadership by investing in women who are strong individual performers, as well as businesses that want to support women returning from career breaks by helping them rebuild confidence and transition meaningfully into leadership roles.
Storytelling isn’t just reserved for bedtime tales or entertainment; it’s a powerful tool that lies at the heart of every successful business narrative. For Founders navigating the competitive landscape, the art of storytelling isn’t just an added skill; it’s a strategic necessity. Crafting a compelling narrative has become a cornerstone for Founders seeking to captivate investors, engage customers, and inspire teams. However, mastering this art can be a challenge. In this blog post, we’ll delve into the impact storytelling can have on founders and why getting the guidance of a skilled storytelling coach can be a game-changer in the journey toward business success.”
A storytelling coach plays a pivotal role in honing a founder’s ability to craft narratives that transcend mere facts and figures. They guide founders in developing a compelling story that weaves together the essence of their vision, values, and mission. Through personalized coaching, founders can learn to communicate their ideas with clarity, persuasion, and memorability. This goes beyond a traditional pitch; it involves creating a narrative that captivates the audience, making them not just understand the information but feel connected to it on a deeper level.
Here are 5 ways in which Start-up founders can benefit from a storytelling coach:
#1 Developing Confidence & Presentation Skills
The ability to confidently and effectively present ideas is crucial for the success of founders, especially in situations like public speaking and pitching to various stakeholders. A storytelling coach can significantly contribute to improving presentation skills, reducing anxiety, and boosting confidence.
CRAFTING A CLEAR & COMPELLING NARRATIVE
A storytelling coach works with founders to craft a clear and compelling narrative for their presentations. This involves not only organizing information logically but also incorporating storytelling elements that engage the audience. By having a well-structured and interesting story to tell, founders can feel more confident in delivering their message.
PERSONAL CONNECTION WITH THE CONTENT
Confidence in presenting often comes from a genuine connection with the presented material. A storytelling coach helps founders develop a personal connection to their story. This involves identifying key elements of the narrative that resonate with the founder on a personal level. When a presenter is genuinely invested in the content, it translates into confidence during the presentation.
OVERCOMING ANXIETY THROUGH REHEARSAL
Anxiety in public speaking is natural, but a storytelling coach assists founders in managing and overcoming this anxiety through focused rehearsal techniques. By practicing the delivery of the narrative, founders become more familiar and comfortable with the material. The coach provides constructive feedback, helping the founder refine their delivery and build confidence through preparation.
CREATING A POSITIVE MINDSET
Confidence is closely tied to mindset. A storytelling coach works with founders to cultivate a positive mindset about presenting. This involves reframing thoughts about potential challenges, embracing mistakes as learning opportunities, and focusing on the value of the message being delivered. A positive mindset contributes significantly to the overall confidence of the presenter.
#2 Building a Deep Connection with Audience
Storytelling helps create an emotional connection with the audience. Whether it’s investors looking for passion and commitment or customers seeking a solution to their problems, a well-crafted story can engage and resonate with the audience on a deeper level.
FOSTERING EMPATHY
Storytelling has a unique ability to evoke emotions. When founders share authentic stories that reflect their journey, challenges, and triumphs, they humanize their brand. This human touch fosters empathy, allowing the audience to relate to the founder on a personal level. Investors are not just investing in a business; they are investing in the person behind the business. Customers, likewise, are drawn to brands that resonate with their values and experiences. A storytelling coach can guide founders in identifying and articulating these pivotal moments that evoke empathy and create a sense of shared experience.
BUILDING TRUST
Trust is the bedrock of any successful business relationship. Through storytelling, founders can build trust by showcasing transparency, authenticity, and vulnerability. When a founder shares the story of their entrepreneurial journey, including the setbacks and lessons learned, it demonstrates honesty and resilience. A storytelling coach can provide constructive feedback to ensure that these narratives are presented in a way that enhances trust and credibility, reinforcing the founder’s integrity in the eyes of the audience.
ALIGNING WITH AUDIENCE VALUES
A well-crafted story can also align with the values and aspirations of the audience. Investors, for instance, may be drawn to stories of innovation and societal impact, while customers may connect with narratives that address their pain points and provide meaningful solutions. A storytelling coach helps founders tailor their stories to align with the values and expectations of their specific audience segments, ensuring a more profound and resonant connection.
CAPTURING ATTENTION
Stories have an inherent allure that captures attention. Whether it’s an anecdote about overcoming a hurdle or a narrative that illustrates the genesis of a revolutionary idea, storytelling compels the audience to lean in and listen. A skilled storytelling coach assists founders in identifying the narrative elements that are most likely to resonate with their target audience. By understanding the audience’s aspirations, concerns, and motivations, founders can tailor their stories to align with these factors, creating a more profound and lasting impact.
#3 Communicating your Differentiation
In a competitive start-up landscape, having a unique and compelling story can set a founder and their company apart. A storytelling coach can help founders identify and emphasize their distinctive narrative, helping them stand out in a crowded market.
DEFINING THE UNIQUE VALUE PROPOSITION
Every startup has a unique value proposition, and a storytelling coach can assist founders in crystallizing and communicating this distinctiveness. By delving into the core of what makes the product or service exceptional, the coach can help identify narrative elements that emphasize the uniqueness. Whether it’s a revolutionary technology, a novel approach to solving a problem, or a founder’s personal journey that inspired the venture, a storytelling coach can guide the founder in articulating these aspects in a way that resonates with the target audience.
AMPLIFYING THE FOUNDER’S VOICE
Founders often play a central role in the identity of a startup. Their vision, passion, and personality can become powerful differentiators. A storytelling coach works with founders to amplify their voice in a way that aligns with the brand story. This might involve integrating personal anecdotes, showcasing the founder’s motivation, or highlighting unique perspectives. By doing so, the founder becomes not just the face of the company but a compelling character in a narrative that distinguishes the startup.
#4 Building Brand Identity
Storytelling is an essential component of brand-building. Start-ups need to establish a strong brand identity from the outset, and a storytelling coach can assist in crafting a narrative that aligns with the brand’s values, mission, and culture. Startups often have distinct cultures and personalities that set them apart. Whether it’s a culture of innovation, a commitment to customer-centricity, or a playful and dynamic atmosphere, a storytelling coach assists founders in translating these cultural aspects into a narrative. This narrative, when effectively communicated, humanizes the brand, making it relatable and appealing to the target audience. It goes beyond product features to showcase the ethos and personality that define the startup.
Fundraising is a critical aspect of start-up growth and storytelling has a crucial role to play in 3 ways:
CREATING AN EFFECTIVE ELEVATOR PITCH
In the fast-paced world of fundraising, having a concise and memorable elevator pitch is crucial. A storytelling coach works with founders to distill their narrative into a succinct and impactful pitch that can be delivered within a short timeframe. This elevator pitch, when crafted effectively, serves as a powerful tool for sparking initial interest and opening the door to more in-depth conversations with investors.
BUILDING THE PROBLEM SOLUTION NARRATIVE
A successful pitch not only outlines the business model but also communicates a clear understanding of the problem the startup is solving. A storytelling coach guides founders in emphasizing the problem-solution narrative, making it relatable and compelling. By framing the pitch in a way that highlights the pain points of the target market and how the startup provides a viable solution, founders can effectively capture the interest and confidence of potential investors
BUILDING CREDIBILITY
Trust is a critical factor in fundraising. A storytelling coach helps founders build credibility by strategically integrating key milestones, achievements, and the lessons learned from challenges into the pitch. This storytelling approach demonstrates not only the potential of the business but also the resilience and adaptability of the founding team. Investors are more likely to have confidence in a startup that can articulate a credible and well-rounded narrative
CREATING A LASTING IMPRESSION
Fundraising pitches are numerous, and making a lasting impression is essential. A storytelling coach ensures that the pitch is not just informative but leaves a memorable impact on investors. Through the artful use of storytelling techniques, founders can create a pitch that stands out, making them more likely to be remembered and considered for investment.
In conclusion, storytelling is a vital skill for start-up founders in various aspects of their entrepreneurial journey, from pitching to investors and customers to building their brand identity and overcoming challenges. A storytelling coach can provide valuable expertise and guidance to help founders effectively communicate their vision and achieve their business goals.
So, embrace the storyteller within you, and watch your startup story become the talk of the town!
To know more about TransforMe’s Storytelling offering, click here.
If you would like to know more about how we can help your start-up or organisation through Storytelling, write to us at connectATtransformelearning.com.
Securing stakeholder buy-in for Women Leadership Programs is critical in advancing gender diversity and promoting a more inclusive and equitable workplace. The importance of this support cannot be overstated, as executives hold the power to allocate resources, set strategic priorities, and shape organisational culture. Challenges can emerge when attempting to gain their commitment. Executives may be preoccupied with other pressing concerns, unconvinced of the business case for women’s leadership, or simply unaware of the potential opportunities.
How can People leaders build a business case for women leadership programs in their organisation? Why does women leadership continue to lag behind, what are some of the ground challenges that keep organisations from committing fully or scaling their Gender Equity efforts?
For our November 2023 edition of The Leaders’ Café, we had a special guest – Mathew Paine, a distinguished leader with over two decades of experience in human resources, organisational culture, and fostering women’s leadership. As the Executive General Manager – People & Culture at the Australian Financial Complaints Authority, Mathew is passionate about creating safe, inclusive, and productive workplaces where women can thrive and he shared some incredible insights on this topic with us.
Summary
There are 3 key challenges for women with career progression – 1. Women have greater carrying responsibilities outside of work, therefore, it’s the woman who have to sacrifice their career for child-caring responsibilities 2. Women apply less frequently for roles than men 3 Women are more likely to doubt their skills and the chance of getting a role
Every leader must ask – does our workforce represent the community that we serve? Australia, in particular, is a very diverse country. And if we don’t see the diversity inside the organisation, and we’re providing a service to the general population, something’s not right. So we need to start from a data-led approach to gender equity or DEI at large
Mentorship and Sponsorship – Women are over-mentored, but they are under-sponsored, there are a lot of opportunities for women to upskill a key support that women leaders need today is to have somebody open the door, use the network and get them the position that they deserve
Business case for Gender Equity beyond profitability – In 2024, the Workplace Gender Equality agency will be publicly publishing the gender pay gap of every organisation, not government, but all private organisations with more than 100 employees. And whilst there’s probably some, some of those organisations that do have only males at the top, and there could be females that are more junior levels that will just showcase even more the gap between the genders the pay gap between the genders. So there’s a real business benefit of making sure that organisations are, first of all measuring what the pay gap is, but then analysing their data and looking at what they can do because organisations are also going to be under stricter media scrutiny and need to be mindful of brand reputation risks they run
With the economic slowdown and budget cuts, why organisations need to keep women leadership on their agenda – Reputation and Brand are crucial – they can have a huge impact on budgets, as well as turnover, lack of diversity and leadership can also lead to missed business opportunities. It could be a limited talent pooling or the brand and the reputation of the organisation. If it’s very male centric, that it may be that women just don’t want to go and work there. And that’s becoming more and more popular in Australia, where the employee makes a choice as to where they would like to work. And so they should, and if they’re not seeing the diversity or the ethics, or the values that they adhere to, personally, then they just won’t go there. So that’s going to have an impact also on profitability. Ultimately, shareholders, particularly for the public listed companies, they expect a shareholder expects to see not just that an organisation is producing results and profits. But more and more we’re seeing shareholders wanting to see the ethical components, as well are upheld by the boards and the CEOs of organisations.
FULL TRANSCRIPT
Sandra Colhando: Thank you, Matt. I want to start with your story. You hold the Chief People Officer domain, the role and there’s so much that comes under it from employee engagement, recruitment, and retention to performance, productivity, etc. Why is DEI so important for you?
Mathew Paine: For me, it really is about creating inclusive workplaces that then create a positive brand in the eyes of consumers and employees. Research shows that having a diverse pool of talent also brings about a variety of perspectives and that really helps to foster innovation, creativity, and ultimately boosting employee satisfaction and retention. And particularly in the HR world, a lot of the metrics that we use could be around satisfaction or engagement retention. And ultimately they also lead to no greater profits. And there are certainly shareholders and boards that are very interested in in seeing those metrics.
Sandra Colhando: Beautiful. And I know you’ve had this rich two decades of experience to actually see that happen. See that fruit refine in terms of results? When we look at some data points, for example, WGEA released a data set where they say that while women make up half of employees, about 51%, only 19% of CEOs of women, why do you feel is there a gap? Or what? What can be done to bridge this gap?
Mathew Paine: Yeah, it’s an interesting conundrum. I think if we step it up, and we think about from a global perspective, the World Economic Forum, every year brings out the Global Gender Gap index. And that benchmarks the current state, in the evolution of gender parity across a number of dimensions. And I just had a look at that this week. And for 2023, the number one country in the world out of 146, that they measure is Iceland, they’re doing a huge amount of work there. Australia is ranked number 26, which for a developed country, I would hope that it’s higher than that. And looking at India, it’s 127. So there are some huge gaps there. And if things keep going, they’ve been doing this for about 10 years. At speed, it’s going to take 131 years to bridge that gap. So there needs to be some quite drastic measures and initiatives put in place. And then if we think about more, Australia, in the UK, there is a gender pay gap in Australia of over 20%, about 22.8% To be specific, and men are twice as likely to be in the top income bracket as women and about boards. Only one in five boards have gender balance. So when I was when I was working in the New South Wales Government, there was a behavioural insights project that was completed around career progression of that was in conjunction with the Public Service Commission. The results found that there were four key challenges for women with career progression. And they were that women report that there’s more barriers to career progression. That women have greater caring responsibilities outside of work, therefore, it’s the woman that work or they have to sacrifice their career for child caring responsibilities, or also women apply less frequently for roles than men. And women are more likely to doubt their skills, and the chance of getting a role. Meaning a male may see a job and think, yeah, well look I am just here, but I’m going to apply anyway. Whereas a woman from this research that we conducted, was more likely to doubt their skills. So I think if you think about all that, together, there are probably a number of factors that still are at play. And we hear a lot about bias and stereotypes. There may be lack of representation also, of females in more senior roles in organisations; therefore, women may not envisage themselves to be in those roles. It could be that there is a workplace culture, or there’s practices in place that may lead to women not wanting to do those roles. For example, if there’s a really long working hours culture, if there is inflexibility of the work structure, maybe there’s no hybrid working or a lack of flexible working, all of those things can and those practices can really impact on the way women work. And then of course, things like unconscious bias when it comes to recruitment and promotion. There was a study recently actually in Australia, where it was for people and it’s not just women, but those that are working remotely. Could be overseen or over overlooked when it comes to promotions because they’re not in the office. And I think that there’s an overlay there. And then you know, other things like work life challenges. And in Maybe there’s even a lack of accountability inside organisations, you know, not holding CEOs or boards to account. So there’s probably a lot there. But that’s, that’s what I think.
Sandra Colhando: Beautiful. I am making notes and there seems a huge laundry list of why and what is the gap. I know there is work happening but in all of this, sometimes it just feels it’s so overwhelming. Where do we start? What’s the first step we take? With your experience and the background that you have- we are looking at recruitment, productivity, looking at culture, we’re looking at accountability, what will be the first step to take to start building this culture of gender equity?
Mathew Paine: Yeah, I think, like, where we need to start is thinking about the organisation, whatever organisation it is that that our listeners are working at. And I have always asked the question – does our workforce represent the community that we serve? Australia, in particular, is a very diverse country. And if we don’t see the diversity inside the organisation, and we’re providing a service to the general population, something’s not right. So we tend to start from a data-led approach. And it’s important to understand the matrix and how many, what is the gender breakdown, there might be some other diversity, and demographics that also organisations can measure and track, and then there’s the intersectionality of those two. So, you know, that may not be that it’s just male and female. But then if we add on other intersections, like cultural and linguistic diversity, could be an employee with a disability, could be that they identify as having a different sexual orientation. So there are many different factors. But I thiny understanding the data of your workforce is important. And that also really sets the the roadmap of where it is that you would like to go, and what’s the gap, and then thinking about some initiatives of how to bridge that gap. But I think if you don’t start with some type of a benchmark, it’s you need to know where you’re going. But you also need to know where you’re starting from.
Sandra Colhando: Absolutely, you’re connection is breaking up a little bit. So I’m just quickly summarizing – what you’re sharing is, you know, we need to look at where the organisation is, how’s the organisation representative of the clients or customers they’re serving. And how can we add in the sections and the diversity and work from there? I think what connected deeply with me when you’re, when you’re sharing this is setting the roadmap firs, before we jump into various initiatives, you want to see, what’s the road map for me as an organisation, which could be very different for another organisation at the same time. And what’s my way around it? And why do I need to have that included in our values? I think when you talk about the environment and culture of an organisation; it shouldn’t just be a tick in the box. It shouldn’t be just because it makes top-line sense that’s important for business, but it needs to go much deeper to create that sense of belongingness and organisation. And the decision-makers typically have that when you say the roadmap, are the executives, are people sitting at the board at the C suite level. That brings me to the question I know in an interview with HRM, you talked about selling diversity, and equity inclusion to the C-suite as one of the most significant challenges in this field. What do you think of what key elements should, say people cultural leaders need to include in the business case for women’s leadership programme to secure executive buy-in?
Mathew Paine: Good question, I think and you touch there about organisational values. So you know, really that there is alignment to values that there is an alignment to the organizational goals and emphasise how women leadership programs can align with the broader goals of the organisation, could be around improving innovation, diversity, and market competitiveness. And also the quantifiable benefits, there’s a lot of research out there that shows that a more diverse organisation has higher profits than those that are less diverse. But I think also it’s understanding the talent pipeline that you have internally, and helping to define what those success metrics are. Anthere are’s probably there’s pros and cons to setting targets. I’ve worked in organisations that have and have not, and I’m happy to talk about that. But I think, like I’ve mentioned before, you really need to know where it is that you’re going, as an organisation, and put it in, I think we can probably see the biggest change when we do have metrics that we put in place for the C suite, the executive team. And I’ve seen also where they might receive their bonus could be tied to those or their pay increases could be tied to particular metrics. And it’s not just financial, but also diversity metrics.
Sandra Colhando: That’s interesting. And you also talked aboutthe pros and cons of setting targets. So in your lived professional experience, what could be a target that is a pro that makes sense organisation because it drives positive culture in making this change? And what could be a target? That could be a con, which you need to be careful, about because it may not be a driving impact. It’s a target, we’re moving in that direction, but it’s not driving the right.
Mathew Paine: Yes. Okay, so I’ll give you an example, when I worked in the New South Wales Government, the Premier of the State had set targets, under particular diversity targets for all employers in the public sector. So we were working towards 50% women in senior leadership roles. And then there were some other metrics for other diversity initiatives. So I think the positive there was that there was a goal, everybody knew where we were going. And those targets were set up to 2025. So it wasn’t just an immediate overnight initiative, there were, you know, well-executed planned approaches to several initiatives. But where I’ve seen these initiatives or targets fall is where the Why isn’t explained properly. Those that don’t identify in those particular demographics, then they may go for a role and feel that they didn’t get the role because of their gender or because their diversity doesn’t align with that. So I think there needs to be, you know, real merit behind recruitment and selection. But sometimes, through initiatives, particular programs that work, they can certainly help to develop people. So an example that I worked with in government was we had a few different initiatives. One was the women in the senior leadership mentoring programme. It was a specific programme, only aimed at women who had high potential to move into a leadership role. And they were mentored by another executive who had already reached that goal, who was already working at that level. And it was a 12-month programme. And it was extremely popular. We always had so many people that wanted to be on it, because they saw that there were real tangible outcomes. And it wasn’t that they were favoured, but through their mentoring relationships and also the education that they received, It helped to shape them to then on, on their own merit when they went for a role that they felt comfortable and were able to achieve the selection criteria. And another programme that we ran was the Open Doors programme and which was a career sponsorship programme. So the difference between mentoring and sponsorship is mentoring is more about being available and assisting and helping to mentor and coach whereas the sponsorship programme was opening doors, but very soon new executives, who are then able to use their own connections, to then open doors and connections to those people who were then able to grow and to develop and to really benefit from that and leverage those executives, senior leadership roles. So we certainly had great success with both of those programmes. And we’re able to see some demonstrable outcomes.
Sandra Colhando: Oh, those are great programmes you talked about, we keep talking about this, there be maybe enough mentorship, maybe women are over-mentored, but they under-sponsored. So happy to hear you talk about the open-door programme, because there are a lot of opportunities for women to upskill. But I think the biggest support that women leaders need that is to have somebody open the door, use the network, and get them the position that they deserve. What about skill building? Matt, what do you feel? Do we need a separate programme for women leaders for them to skill belt to reach those positions?
Mathew Paine: Well, the success that we had with the women in the senior leadership programme was also that every couple of months, there would be a skills development programme aimed at that cohort of women that were on the programme. So I think there was some great marriage in that, where women were able to come along and discuss some of the issues that they may be facing and hear from other women about how they’re overcoming that or in the groups that they’ve been allocated with their trainer, that they can unpack that. And some of it could be, you know, purely down to their own confidence. And other things might be around skills. But I have seen that particular programmes aimed at women have had great outcomes. Having said that, I’ve also seen other programmes where it’s mixed genders, and there are also great outcomes. So I think it will probably depend on the content of those skills programmes, but I’m certainly not adverse to them.
Sandra Colhando: Yeah, often, we are asked why we need to have a separate women leadership programme and why not a mixed gender and you’re right, there is merit for both. But I also feel they’re very unique challenges that women professionals go through, which are listed out beautifully earlier in our talk, whether it’s you know, carrying responsibilities as a doubt imposter syndrome, which sometimes a uniquely hire for that gender, and therefore having a program exclusively to take care of those challenges, helps in managing and not creating a safe space for them to feel we are not in it alone there other women professionals going through this challenge and this asset community that’s created for us to move ahead. What I wanted to talk about, and you shared some very interesting initiatives that you’ve run, especially with the NSW Government in terms of targets. What can we do when maybe you don’t have an organisation that has a very strong executive mind for women leadership? Let’s take an example. An organisation is already profitable, and doing really well. But there is very little gender balance of the leadership in the leadership’s executive C suite, how do you showcase the return on investment on women’s leadership to them?
Mathew Paine: Yeah, it’s a good question. I think, particularly these days, we’re seeing more and more media for and not always positive, sometimes negative media, where there are organisations that don’t have good gender balance or don’t have good diversity, particularly as they go higher. And especially in Australia, for the next year 2024, the Workplace Gender Equality agency will be publicly publishing the gender pay gap of every organisation, not the government, but all private organisations with more than 100 employees. And whilst there are probably some, some of those organisations that do have only males at the top, and there could be females that are more junior levels that will just showcase even more the gap between the genders the pay gap, I should say between the genders. So there’s a real business benefit of making sure that organisations are, first of all measuring what the pay gap is, but then analysing their data and looking at what they can o, because I havy no doubt that from next year, there will be quite a few media articles that will come out that won’t be positive in a variety of different organisations in Australia. But I think also, then it just goes back to thinking about Australia in particular, as well, actually, no, not just Australia, but globally, there’s an ageing population. So women’s economic workforce participation is becoming more and more important around the world. The more women that are working, and particularly moving into more senior roles, the bigger the impact it is for the economy, that of the country that they’re in, the more tax they pay, those taxes then have benefits for the whole country. So there’s, there’s real equity, measures them. And outside of that, it’s just the right thing to do. So I think from an ethical perspective, organisations these days have got a lot of measures around ethics and sustainability, and gender balance, particularly in senior roles should be on everyone’s agenda.
Sandra Colhando: While we have this coming next year, which is working around the workplace gender balance, in today’s economic conditions, and with so-called economic slowdown, organisations now are holding on to the budgets. What’s your take on the future of women’s leadership landscape, in this environment, in this mind space?
Mathew Paine: Well, look, think about reputation and brand and that can have a huge impact on budgets, as well as turnover. And lack of diversity and leadership can also lead to missed business opportunities. I know, a lot of the consulting firms these days, when they go out, and they target business projects, they do all of this analysis before they then go off and select the organisation that they might want to work with. So there’s some potential of lost business there. It could be limited talent pooling or the brand and the reputation of the organisation. If it’s very male-centric, that it may be that women just don’t want to go and work there. And that’s becoming more and more popular in Australia, where the employee chooses as to where they would like to work. And so they should, and if they’re not seeing the diversity or the ethics, or the values that they adhere to, personally, then they just won’t go there. So that’s going to have an impact also on profitability. And, yeah, I mean, ultimately, shareholders, particularly for the publicly listed companies, expect a shareholder expects to see not just that an organisation is producing results and profits. But more and more we’re seeing shareholders wanting to see the ethical components, as well upheld by the boards and the CEOs of organisations.
Sandra Colhando: Yeah, it makes sense because you’re looking at a whole rounded organisation that not just looking at profits, but looking at the culture that’s creating in the future as well, was the thread if we just continue unidirectional? How do you get executive buy-in with data? Do you feel that the onus is only on say the chief people, learning and development departments to create that buy-in? Can anyone else in the organisation play a role and how can they create that noise with executives to make this happen?
Mathew Paine: Hmm, that’s a great question. Look, it shouldn’t be led just by HR or L&D. I mean, there’s organisational initiatives. And ideally, they should be sponsored at the executive level. So where I’ve seen the biggest impact in these areas is when an organisation decides to go down this track, and they might launch, for example, a diversity, inclusion, and belonging strategy. And within that, there might be multiple silos or segments of diversity that they would like to work on. So there could be, for example, demographics of women in senior leadership, which is the topic for today, it could be people with disability, it might be LGBTQIA+ inclusion, could be other things. But then, it’s not just about having a plan on a page, it’s about bringing it to life, I would suggest that there are executive sponsors for each of those. And then within that, it’s also brought to life through the employees, what we call an employee resource group. So for example, there could be a shared agenda, a women’s employee resource group, there might be people with disability, and there could be other cohorts that those groups get together. And it’s not just about social connection, but it’s also thinking about from an organisational perspective, what can they do better? What’s their feedback? Are there policies or procedures that are getting in the way of workforce participation? Are there things that are a handler to, to the workforce? What are the other metrics, if the organisation is doing surveys, what’s the feedback from those groups being able to break down survey responses by demographic So ideally, I would see that there is executive sponsorship, employee resource groups, and an action plan that is regularly communicated back out to the organisation, and that the CEO is involved, or the most senior person in the organisation is involved in that as well.
Sandra Colhando: When you share this, is that there’s a story that came up for me when you talked about employee resource groups, especially women. And this happened around COVID, when you know, budgets were shut down organisations were not getting into investment mode. So there’s a client of ours and their organisation was severely hit by the COVID shutdown leading to budget cuts. But there was a women’s resource group that got together. So the women professionals just got together in the organisation and they decided to drive the agenda, they would fix these meetings, they would actually reach out to industry leaders, facilitators, coaches and create this once-a-month forum where they’ll invite a coach on a special topic, and they ran a program with zero budgets. Yeah, so that’s a great example of when you talked about women’s resource group, how they can gather resources and get that done. Hmm,
Mathew Paine: Yeah, totally. And I’ve seen that those grassroots initiatives where it’s not actually led by the organisation that’s led by the members of the group can sometimes have even greater impact.
AUDIENCE QUESTIONS
Sandra Colhando: I’m seeing our questions here. So I’m going to jump right into the question especially there’s a question that resonates with the one that I had for you. Can you share a comparative view of how the public sector and private sector varies in gender representation in Australia? I think one of the past speakers mentioned that the public sector needs to up its game and has things to learn from some positive initiatives undertaken by corporate sector. Your thoughts, please?
Mathew Paine: Good question. I guess first of all, I don’t have the data right in front of me, so I wouldn’t be able to answer exactly the specifics. But what can what I can say is there were a few initiatives that were run in Australia that really helped to increase participation, particularly women in the private sector. And that was the male Champions of Change programme, which you may have heard of, and that programme really was a call out to male, particularly male sponsors and male CEOs. And looking at how they can make organisational change, that would then lead to greater female representation and the view through that initiative, which is still going. And maybe it’s not as popular as at what it was, but certainly still going, there was a very large increase of women participation, but equally in the public sector, which is where I also had experience, particularly New South Wales, when the premier set targets for 50% women in senior leadership, it really helped myself particularly as a chief people officer and in the role that I was in the executive director role also that I held, to be able to hold leaders to accountable and to say, every month, we would measure where we’re, we’re able to look at the gap, we’re able to then come up with some really meaningful programmes and regularly report that data, and how we’re increasing that data to the executive team through a monthly pack of data and metrics. And that visibility at the senior level really helps everyone to have buy-in. And, you know, I think it makes in some cases, it might make it easier when you’ve got you’ve got that real push, particularly when we’re getting close to achieving that. So I think in the end, where you’ve got leaders, most leaders, particularly doesn’t matter what industry, private or public would want to achieve targets. So there’s that old saying what gets measured gets done or variations of it. But I think that that helps.
Sandra Colhando: That’s a brilliant example of how you get executive buy-in, because you have a target come from an executive or come from the top, and you actually measure it and continue in that direction. Yeah, and what gets measured gets seen as well.
Mathew Paine: There is probably one more thing on that topic. It was important for us as well to really highlight and demonstrate particular days of significance in the calendar year. So International Women’s Day is one that comes to mind. And on International Women’s Day, every year, we would hold an event, it was for all genders, not just women, but we would highlight and we’d have normally a panel of female leaders, successful female leaders that would talk about their leadership journey, their struggles in how it is that they might be able to juggle work with family, and any other things that they might want to talk about and really showcase their story. Because then other female leaders and other females can aspire and learn from those. So having those real-life stories and bringing those days of significance to life, I I find that helps a lot.
Sandra Colhando: Absolutely. I’m going to go to the next question – What role do emerging women leaders play in achieving gender diversity?
Mathew Paine: I think that everyone has a part to play in this and those that have succeeded and got already achieved those female leadership roles. They should also be helping the pipeline or talent behind them. Because and I see this and it’s not just in female leadership, but all levels of diversity. That if everyone helps to pave that, that journey forward, it’s going to make it easier and more acceptable for those who are still aspiring to go through that journey. So for them to be able to use their experience, maybe talk about what worked well for them, and what didn’t work well. Being a mentor, and being available to coach other people that might want to aspire. Everyone has a part to play and and hopefully they can use their own experience to help others.
Sandra Colhando: Yeah, I think that’s linked to the next question. From your experience, Matthew, what us some of the top three skills that were in professionals can build or work towards to becoming a strong contender, contender for the top positions?
Mathew Paine: Oh, that’s a hard one. There are so many amazing skills that are out there. Look, I always say to anybody, if they would like to move up the ladder, it’s thinking about their curiosity, their innovation, but also, going for a more senior role is not just about technical skills. It’s about people leadership, and it’s about relationships, negotiation, it’s about how to navigate difficult decisions. So it’s, you know, focusing on what’s probably traditionally called maybe those softer skills. Because it’s not just about the hard skill of doing your job leaders have to be able to really have that emotional intelligence to be able to deal with many different scenarios. So having that that level of, of skill is important. But I think look, it probably also depends on the role that they’re going for, but certainly people leadership, I’d be looking if someone’s going for a leadership position, ideally, that they’ve done some type of other mentoring coaching or leadership, it could be an in an external voluntary role, or it might be something else.
Sandra Colhando: Yeah, I was looking at when you talked about E, I am looking at E IA, it is having emotional intelligence and action. Sometimes we have emotional intelligence, we know what’s happening, but the action gets missed. And that’s where true change comes. And that’s why we drive that change is still an experiment, failures, shouldn’t be a roadblock. But just to try more aspects, more doors, one door closes, how do we open the next door? Yeah,
Mathew Paine: That’s right. You mentioned before about imposter syndrome. And I think like, that’s common for many people. In that they may not, they may not think of themselves as the best person for the role that they’ve got to the role and that they’re doubting their own skills and experience. And I think it is normal. But having, not letting it become so debilitating, that you can’t actually then perform in the role and action.
Sandra Colhando: in this section, I do want to share my own personal take on impostor syndrome, because I had a lot of impostor syndrome. There are many opportunities, I didn’t raise my hand, early in my career, and I missed many opportunities. They’re, they’re funny stories now. But they weren’t that time, and I missed it. But this is what I tell myself to overcome impostor syndrome is saying that there is no rule ever, I’d be perfect for, especially in this uncertain environment, that we are working and then uncertain world that we are in, we will never be perfect in any role, because you don’t have control of what happens externally. So knowing that and then jumping into that situation, raising your hand for that opportunity is the best thing you can do for yourself and for the road that you take. And that’s my little tip on how I overcame it. Before we wrap up, we have a minute to go. I’m going to take up the last question – Are there unique considerations or challenges in gaining executive buy-in from leadership in a global context? And how can these be addressed?
Mathew Paine: Hmm, yeah, that’s a it’s a deep question. And I think definitely, in a global context, there are unique circumstances and that would come down to the cultural have elements of that country. If I talk about it, from my experience in the Western world, certainly in Australia, I’ve worked in roles that also cover New Zealand and the UK or worked in London for eight years. I think these days, it’s definitely more and more accepted. And it’s not just accepted, it’s actually expected that organisations have that cultural and gender diversity. But having said that, there’s there’s countries that are still out there in the world that have got a long way to go. So, you know, I can’t probably comment so much about those countries. But, you know, certainly being able to focus on the ones and the initiatives that work is something that I would focus in, probably just express that. Yes, in some countries, there’s a long way to go. But I’m hoping that, you know, what, take that 131 years that what I mentioned at the start with the World Economic Forum data.
Sandra Colhando: Yeah, I believe that’s a good start point. And what you shared so far, and, of course, it’s a call for action in any country talk about results, you talk about innovation, creativity, bias, etc. It’s common, but I think the cultural aspect if we have storytelling that’s associated with it, which is unique to your culture, showcasing those stories, this case studies, I think that creates that uniqueness in each culture. Thank you, Matt, for these rich insights for our team. And thank you, everyone who’s been listening and we’ll be seeing the recording as well. Thank you for your questions. Thank you for being there. We’ll be back next month for another interesting topic. Get ready for the holidays and enjoy the next few weeks. Thank you everyone.